Share this news postcommented on "http://goo.gl/wTmYF ..."/news/hr-roundtable-hr-would-be-a-whole-lot-better-if/4236811 February at 17:33 from atlas
This is one school of thought... what are you looking for in your HR people!
Direct from the January 2013 HR Roundtable in Cincinnati, the monthly topic had a sharper feel to it. Gathering to discuss "HR would be better if …"
The group received direction, because to sit back and bash HR is (honestly) way too easy. Too often, when discussions of this topic occur, either in person or in print, the railing calls against the evils of HR rear their ugly head.
So, they came up with something that HR pros could take, review, and act upon:
HR would be better if …
- They could build consensus. The feeling was that HR tends to try to be sympathetic vs. being empathetic. Other groups tend to make HR into the "feely" people, and therefore, don't look to them to take into account the human factor of situations. Building consensus is an essential skill for all facets of business and HR needs to learn to play in this arena.
- They weren't the compliance police. Amen and amen! Even though HR professionals say they don't like this side of what they do, too many people tend to rely on compliance as their guide and use it to lead into most situations. A different approach is to view policies and procedures as parameters for employees to thrive within instead of thinking that people are breaking the "rules."
- They were proactive and decisive. This needs to be the driver to great HR within organizations. Rule makers and hall monitors just doesn't cut it. Also, if you are an HR person who is always "putting out fires," then you are more reactionary than proactive. Decisiveness is a skill needed by all business people. Senior Management looks to HR to be a decisive force in their companies.
- They recognize they have a customer. Customer focused HR is not a new concept, but it is rarely a practiced concept. Understanding that HR is the leader and shepherd of a company's employees is key to knowing that all people who work at a company are a customer. They all have different needs that HR can assess and address consistently.
- They knew their business objectives. This isn't the classic "HR needs to know the business" mantra. It is a call for HR to see itself as a business function that needs to have objectives and results just as much as every other department within an organization.
- Everyone realized they're in HR! What is this blasphemy? It's a fact! HR needs to proclaim to executives that all employees have a hand in HR. This isn't just about a person, or a department. Wherever there are people involved, the potential for an HR situation, issue, or opportunity will be present. Think of HR as integrated throughout instead of the lone silo at the end of the hall.
- They knew how they affected the bottom line. HR needs to own up to this. As a business function, HR affects the bottom line both positively and negatively. If an organization only thinks of HR as "overhead," we might as well be furniture. Knowing how HR makes a difference to business results is critical.
- They were responsive. (Editor's Note:At this point in the meeting there was a very large "harrumphing" that occurred and it sounded like a session of the British Parliament! Amazing — we must have hit a sore point!) To let people hang out there and not know what HR is/isn't doing with their situation is a poor practice. If HR would like to launch positively into the forefront of people's minds, it must get back to folks in a timely manner. It's only human … hence the name of the profession!
- They were given more resources. Many disciplines would give this answer. HR has felt the pinch of being "lean" and having to do more with less. A different way to look at this would be if HR people sought out more resources as well. Get connected, read blogs, meet people in HR, etc. Quit trying to do HR on your own!
- They were allowed to be the human factor in companies. This goes out to the Senior Management of companies. How do you view HR? Are they acting in the manner you want HR to be practiced? If they are, then don't complain. If you don't know what your view/vision/direction of HR is, then change that. Get a direction and build on it. Both HR and your employees yearn for this clarity!
- They were risk takers. Hee, hee. Hear that HR? TAKE RISKS! This is so overdue that's it's frustrating to even summarize. Being a risk taker doesn't mean that you give up the ability to be diligent. It does, however, beg HR to move into the 21st century and beyond. If you know of HR folks who are risk takers, connect with them and see what they do and how they do it. They are more than willing to share what does/doesn't work. The difference is that they're willing to take the risk first.
- They understand how to imprint others. Interesting response. The thought is that HR has the ability to connect the dots of how interpersonal actions have outcomes in various places and with various players. One on one situations are rarely one on one. Be the purveyor of dot connecting and show the various scenarios different HR approaches take. You don't have to rely on the tried and true. You do have to be the one who is consistent and forthright.
- Partner with others. HR needs to pull the curtain back and partner with others both inside and outside of organizations. It can't continue to be the dark tower that people "go to." If HR continues to remain isolated, then businesses won't reach out to ask them to join. This goes back to the proactive side of us that needs to blossom.